It's Time To Face It America, Dearborn, Michigan Has Been Lost To Islam

It's over. The first American city to fall to the advancing horde of Islam is now safely in Muslim hands and much of the nation will now sit back and wait to see which will be the next city to go from patriotic American hands to the mitts of the islamists.

The trial and kangaroo court in Dearborn, Michigan of Terry Jones has shown once proud and Constitution loving Americans bow down to the threat of Islam and they have submitted our personal liberties to the rule of allah.

From the article at Family Security Matters:

Dearborn Police Chief Haddad, Wayne County Prosecutor Moran, and Judge Somers’ responses to the Islamist communities’ threats of violence, violated Jones’ first Amendment Rights. Al-Qazwini said that what Terry Jones is doing is a crime in “our society.” Good Islamists are duty-bound to avenge a crime against Shariah Islam. Al-Qazwini accused Pastor Jones of committing a “crime” against Shariah Islamia. Judge Somers chose to acquiesce and in doing so failed to uphold American laws, which are the Supreme Law of the Land, not Shariah. The judge also failed to acknowledge the Dearborn Muslim communities’ responsibility to observe American law.

The crime Al-Qazwini was referring to is blasphemy. The Dearborn Islamists claimed to be defending insults against Muhammad and Allah, by Terry Jones. They also believed he might continue to do so in the future. The Imam or Sheikh is the supreme leader of the community in matters both civil and religious. Most all good Muslims will blindly follow their Imams’ directives to remain in good standing. The individual Muslim is under great pressure to conform or unthinkably lose their honor and standing in the eyes of their family and community.

Judge Somers should have thrown out this case from the beginning. Judge Somers, Police Chief Haddad, Asst. Prosecutor Moran, Prosecutor Kym Worthy, should all be fired for violating their oaths of office to uphold the Constitution of the United States.

If you remember, during the mid term election campaign, Sharron Angle of Nevada made reference to the fact that sharia law was taking hold in America and gave up the city of Dearborn as an example. The mayor of Dearborn was outraged (as was the liberal media) and the mayor actually invited Angle to Dearborn to prove to her that she was wrong.

Well, Mr. Mayor of Dearborn, Michigan...this trial of Terry Jones invited all of America to view what is actually the case in your city and what we have seen is a bunch of Americans who have submitted to Islam. You and your city are an embarrassment. Last I checked, you surrendered your city to the islamists without firing a single shot. You sounded pretty convincing back in August of 2010 but now the mask has come off...your mayor's office is obviously housed in the minaret of a mosque...and your city officials apparently get on their hands and knees five times a day.

So which city is next, America?

The Dearborn Islamist Political Machine and Pastor Terry Jones


The non-violent actions of Terry Jones are being claimed as the cause for the threat of violence by Dearborn Michigan’s Islamist political machine. This is a clever lie. Terry Jones’ trial in Dearborn illustrates how the Dearborn Islamist community tried to blame Terry Jones for their illegal threats and potentially violent behavior. The Dearborn Chief of Police, Ron Haddad and Prosecutor Kym Worthy, did the bidding of the Islamist majority in that city, by enforcing Islamic Blasphemy laws, and negating Terry Jones’ and Wayne Sapp’s Constitutional First Amendment rights. Jones is the victim of a direct assault on his First Amendment right to free speech by a municipality that is 46% Muslim. The Dearborn Islamist political machine should itself be on trial, for using the threat of violence to achieve a political end, by silencing Pastor Terry Jones and Rev. Wayne Sapp.

During cross examination at the Pastor Terry Jones trial on April 23, 2011, Dearborn Police Chief Ron Haddad testified that Imam Al-Qazwini of the Islamic Center of America said, “that for some members of his Mosque, burning the Quran was considered a crime.” Wayne County Assistant Prosecutor Robert Moran, stated at the trial that Al-Qazwini said, “burning the Qur’an is worse than 1000 deaths. That’s what the citizens of this society believe.”

Robert Spencer writes,

“Liaquat Ali Khan teaches commercial law, arbitration and international law at Washburn University in Topeka, Kansas. He argues that Muslims should petition Congress to outlaw the burning of the Qur'an because doing so incites violence -- in contrast to the burning of the American flag, which, he says, the Supreme Court declined to outlaw because "no disturbance of the peace actually occurred or threatened to occur."

Pastor Terry Jones, according to court testimony, received 300-400 death threats related to his scheduled protest in front of the Islamic Center of America. Four of those death threats originated from the Detroit area and one of those four was traced by law enforcement officials to the South End of Dearborn Michigan. These death threats were ignored as an important element of this story, as reported by the mainstream press.

The only threats of violence were from the Islamist community. During cross examination by Rev. Wayne Sapp, Dearborn Police Chief Ron Haddad begrudgingly testified, that Pastor Terry Jones gave him no indication they were going to burn a Qur’an or do anything provocative or violent. Court records indicate Jones testified his intention was not to protest the Mosque but to protest Jihad and Shariah (Islamic Law).

Who is really guilty of inciting violence, the Muslim community with their threats, or Pastor Jones, by his actions? Because it would be self defeating, I do not endorse the burning or desecration of the Qur’an. There are enough incriminating revelations from Allah himself in the Qur’an if anyone opens the book and reads the text.

Pastor Jones burned a book that was his own property. Jones, to my knowledge, has never threatened or harmed anyone. According to court testimony, Jones has a clean record and passed a government security check to obtain his concealed weapons permit. The First Amendment guarantees Jones freedom of speech and the right to peaceably assemble. How the Dearborn community responds is the sole responsibility of the community and government officials.

How individuals react to someone exercising their free speech falls squarely on the individual’s shoulders, regardless of race, religion, sex, creed, or national origin. Each person must take responsibility for their actions, according to the law in the USA. Al -Qazwini states Jones’ burning the Qur’an is considered a “crime” by some in his community. During court testimony Police Chief Haddad said he denied Jones’ permit for fear Muslim violence would occur. Chief Haddad came to that conclusion through discussions with Al-Qazwini and upon learning of the 300+ death threats against Terry Jones.

Liquat Ali Khan got it right when he implied that if you want to stop an offensive action, just threaten violence.

Dearborn Police Chief Haddad, Wayne County Prosecutor Moran, and Judge Somers’ responses to the Islamist communities’ threats of violence, violated Jones’ first Amendment Rights. Al-Qazwini said that what Terry Jones is doing is a crime in “our society.” Good Islamists are duty-bound to avenge a crime against Shariah Islam. Al-Qazwini accused Pastor Jones of committing a “crime” against Shariah Islamia. Judge Somers chose to acquiesce and in doing so failed to uphold American laws, which are the Supreme Law of the Land, not Shariah. The judge also failed to acknowledge the Dearborn Muslim communities’ responsibility to observe American law.

The crime Al-Qazwini was referring to is blasphemy. The Dearborn Islamists claimed to be defending insults against Muhammad and Allah, by Terry Jones. They also believed he might continue to do so in the future. The Imam or Sheikh is the supreme leader of the community in matters both civil and religious. Most all good Muslims will blindly follow their Imams’ directives to remain in good standing. The individual Muslim is under great pressure to conform or unthinkably lose their honor and standing in the eyes of their family and community.

J.Mark Campbell filmed a juror who stated that the jury reached their guilty verdict by concluding that Jones’ protest, if allowed, could possibly be the spark that would ignite Dearborn’s Muslim community to violence or riot. The juror who said this was in violation of Judge Somers deliberation instructions.

Juror instructions by Judge Somers:

“Non violent expression of an unpopular or unwelcome political or religious belief, by itself, is not enough to find a Breach Of The Peace. Even if the expression of that belief causes someone else to react with anger or alarm.”

Judge Somers should have thrown out this case from the beginning. Judge Somers, Police Chief Haddad, Asst. Prosecutor Moran, Prosecutor Kym Worthy, should all be fired for violating their oaths of office to uphold the Constitution of the United States.

Terry Jones and Wayne Sapp knowingly or unknowingly exposed how far the city of Dearborn will go, to advocate on behalf of their Muslim majority. They did so by enforcing Shariah blasphemy laws because of fear, intimidation, and threats of violence. Terry Jones and Wayne Sapp challenged the Islamist machine in Dearborn, exposing how we must stand up against threats of violence to prevent a Shariah compliant outcome. Our Freedom of Speech is too precious and fragile to be disregarded and shredded by the Dearborn Islamist Political Machine.

The Thomas More Law Center is defending the First Amendment rights of Terry Jones and Wayne Sapp. The mainstream media and general public must demand that Islamists in Dearborn are held accountable for their threats of violence and riot. The strategic use of threatening violence by the Dearborn Islamist Political Machine to achieve a Shariah compliant political end, is the conversation we will have as this case moves forward.

The "No Go" Zones of Europe ...Islam Begins the Final Conquest

This story from Family Security Matters is powerful. And infuriating. Once again we see the Europeans at war with Islam...and enemy the Europeans willfully invited into their midst amongst the empty and veiled promises of the multiculturalists. When you read this article and view the many videos, I promise you that the first reaction from you will be that this simply will never happen in America...well, I'm here to tell you that it HAS begun in parts of America. And there are millions of Europeans that said the same thing ten or fifteen years ago.

I'll continue to hammer the point. Muslims are not emigrating to America for religious freedom or promises of economic success or individual freedoms. They are coming here to conquer America. Just as they are well on their way of doing in Europe.

Below you will find a video which I hope disturbs the hell out of all of you. This has to be shown to everyone in this country. Following the video you will see the article but I encourage you to to to the link above to the actual site so you can view all of the videos embedded there.

World domination by Islam doesn't always mean the conquering of a country on the battlefield...sometimes it starts shop by shop, block by block, street by street. Watch this video and picture this woman as your wife, your mother, your sister, your niece. Feel the rage grow inside of you. Harness it. Focus it. You are going to need it.

Muslims Creating No-Go Areas in Europe


The video below was aired on CBN news. It is a shocking account of how a Parisian store-keeper, a non-Muslim, has been threatened and intimidated by Muslims to make her close her shop. She refuses, but she has had acid thrown at her, she has been raped and attacked on numerous occasions.

France has a higher number of Muslims than any other country in Europe. Politically, President Sarkozy appears to recognize that overly high numbers of Muslims are not good for French social cohesion. Sarkozy is already trying to modify the Schengen rules of Europe to prevent the free movement of Tunisian refugees to France. The Schengen agreement allows any resident of Europe to travel freely within 25 of the 27 European Union nations, without the need for border controls. Italy, whose island of Lampedusa was swamped with economic migrants from Tunisia, has granted six-month visas to thousands of the migrants, and France cannot sustain so many new arrivals. Many of these migrants are heading towards Britain, where a liberal welfare benefits culture awaits them.

Another CBN video shows the extent of Muslim failure to mix with French secular society.

The North African Muslim communities of Paris were the main instigators of riots that took place in the northern suburbs of Paris in the fall of 2005. The riots began after three Muslim youths had run from police, and had tried to hide inside a turbine at an electricity substation. The youths were electrocuted, and two died. The riots then spread throughout Paris and Ile de Cite, with further outbreaks in other large cities with high Muslim populations, such as Lyons, Marseilles and Toulouse in the south.

One should not forget the manner in which such communities are run. The older generation of migrants from North Africa are often out of work, and the power in their fractured households is devolved to young males. Samira Bellil broke the silence about the plight of young women in such households, where many girls who do not wear the veil and adopt Western attitudes are – at the command of these young tyrants - subjected to gang-rape. Young women who are forced to be raped in turn are called “tournantes.”

Samira Bellil, who died of cancer on September 7, 2004, wrote a book on her own experiences of being made into a “tournante”. This book, called “Dans L’Enfer des Tournantes” (Inside the Hell of the Gang-raped) opened the lid on a deep-rooted malaise at the heart of France’s North African communities.

Bellil co-founded a group to assist women who were subjected to similar abuse within France’s Muslim communities. This group, called Ni Putes ni Soumises (Neither whores nor submissives) is still active in demanding emancipation of women subjected to the innate sexism of Muslim oppression.

I documented the fast growth of Muslim-dominated gangs in Britain in a three-part article for FSM in 2008. The article can be read here, here, and here. Such gangs have murdered non-Muslims who wandered onto their “turf”. The worst incidents of Muslim gang violence have involved a South London Muslim group called “The Muslim Boys,” who shot a young man called Adrian Marriott for failing to convert to their form of Islam, and an appalling case from Scotland. Kriss Donald, aged only 15, was abducted from a street by a Muslim gang simply because he was white and not Muslim. He had never met his attackers. Kriss was beaten, stabbed thirteen times, and set on fire. His body was found near a cycle track in Clydeside. Seventy percent of his body was covered with burns. There were rumors that he had been castrated.

While male Muslims take over streets of Europe, the plight of the women within such Islam-dominated segregated communities becomes worse. They are forced by their peers to wear veils and to become “submissives.” Those who do not comply with the prevailing veiling norms are then subjected to intimidation. In London this month, a non-Muslim woman of Bangladeshi origin was told: “Wear a headscarf or be killed.” The woman lives in Whitechapel in East London, where a large proportion of women wear the veil.

Feminists in Britain blithely assume that wearing the veil is a lifestyle choice and ignore the evidence of coercion and compulsion.

In December, Nidra Poller discussed the problem of Muslims illegally taking over a street in Paris where they lay down carpets and pray in the road, completely blocking the thoroughfare. Nidra's article featured a video, which can be seen here:

The situation of Muslims in Italy engaging in prayer in the open (illegally taking over public spaces) really began in Bologna. Here the San Petronio cathedral in Bologna has had threats of bombing, because it contains a 600-year-old fresco inside, painted by Modena. This fresco, inspired by Canto 28 of Dante’s Inferno, shows Mohammed on a rock, with his body split and his bowels extruded. On several occasions in 2006, Muslims in Bologna decided to hold illegal prayers in the square outside the cathedral.

In Moscow too, Muslims engage in illegal occupation of a public street to pray.

Illegal public prayers are often “justified” by claims that they do not have enough space in mosques to pray, but allowing illegal displays only gives citizens the impression that Muslims are “above the law.” Such notions undermine social cohesion and can lead to conflict.

In the 1990s in London, the extremist followers of Abu Hamza took to blocking off streets near Finsbury Park to pray. These actions took place when Hamza had been barred entry from the Finsbury Park Mosque. Police allowed this illicit behavior to continue openly. Hamza, who lost both hands and an eye while making explosives, is now in prison for “soliciting murder.”

Currently, the male political Muslims who encourage such illicit actions are being granted concessions by the authorities in Europe. While such Islamist intransigence is allowed to spread, then women from Muslim communities will become almost invisible (as they are in Brick Lane in London) and in the shadows they will be denied the freedoms that are granted to other women in free societies.

While the authorities in the United States appear to base their treatment of Muslim groups upon the failed models that are employed in Europe, how long will it be before parts of America will become no-go zones for non-Muslims?

Maybe, in Dearborn, Michigan, such a process has already begun.

Adrian Morgan
The Editor, Family Security Matters.

Obama's Claim of Muslim Heritage In America

Barack Obama,
during his Cairo speech, said:
"I know, too, that Islam has always been a part
of America 's story."

AN AMERICAN
CITIZEN'S RESPONSE:


Dear Mr. Obama:

Were those
Muslims that were in America when the Pilgrims
first landed? Funny, I thought they were
Native American Indians.

Were those
Muslims that celebrated the first Thanksgiving
day? Sorry again, those were Pilgrims and
Native American Indians.

Can you
show me one Muslim signature on the United
States Constitution?


Declaration
of Independence ?

Bill of
Rights?


Didn't
think so.


Did
Muslims fight for this country's freedom from
England ? No.


Did
Muslims fight during the Civil War to free the
slaves in America ? No, they did
not. In fact, Muslims to this day are
still the largest traffickers in human
slavery. Your own half brother, a devout
Muslim, still advocates slavery himself, even
though Muslims of Arabic descent refer to black
Muslims as "pug nosed slaves." Says a lot
of what the Muslim world really thinks of your
family's "rich Islamic heritage," doesn't it Mr.
Obama?


Where were
Muslims during the Civil Rights era of this
country? Not present.


There are
no pictures or media accounts of Muslims walking
side by side with Martin Luther King, Jr. or
helping to advance the cause of Civil
Rights.


Where were
Muslims during this country's Woman's Suffrage
era? Again, not present. In fact,
devout Muslims demand that women are subservient
to men in the Islamic culture. So much so,
that often they are beaten for not wearing the
'hajib' or for talking to a man who is not a
direct family member or their husband.
Yep, the Muslims are all for women's rights,
aren't they?


Where were
Muslims during World War II? They were
aligned with Adolf Hitler. The Muslim
grand mufti himself met with Adolf Hitler,
reviewed the troops and accepted support from
the Nazi's in killing Jews.


Finally,
Mr. Obama, where were Muslims on Sept. 11th,
2001? If they weren't flying planes into
the World Trade Center , the Pentagon or a field
in Pennsylvania killing nearly 3,000 people on
our own soil, they were rejoicing in the Middle
East . No one can dispute the pictures
shown from all parts of the Muslim world
celebrating on CNN, Fox News, MSNBC and other
cable news networks that day. Strangely,
the very "moderate" Muslims who's asses you bent
over backwards to kiss in Cairo , Egypt on June
4th were stone cold silent post 9-11. To
many Americans, their silence has meant approval
for the acts of that day.


And THAT, Mr.
Obama, is the "rich heritage" Muslims have here
in America ....


Oh, I'm sorry, I
forgot to mention the Barbary Pirates.
They were Muslim.


And now we can
add November 5, 2009 - the slaughter of American
soldiers at Fort Hood by a Muslim major who is a
doctor and a psychiatrist who was supposed to be
counseling soldiers returning from battle in
Iraq and Afghanistan .


That, Mr. Obama
is the "Muslim heritage" in America
.

Muslim Heritage, my ass.

(Hat tip: Henry Bowman)

Rep. Keith Ellison Takes Off the Mask, Reveals the True Islamist He Is

I'm sure most of you will remember a few weeks ago when Rep. Keith Ellison made all of the network news video clips as he cried like a sloppy baby at the Muslim radicalization hearings put on by Rep. Peter King - you know, the "breakdown" Ellison had as he told the story of a Muslim man involved in the 9/11 attacks. After that ridiculous stunt, I was quick to call it an act...it was staged...those tears were about as real as Ellison's claims that Israel has a right to exist.

Well, according to this article at Family Security Matters, the cat is once again out of the bag about one Mr. Keith Ellison as just a few days after his "emotional" testimony at the hearings, Ellison was out on the road ripping to shreds the testimony of others at the hearing - ripping those that didn't follow the Mohammed line. You've all heard of the "Obama Apology Tour" where Barack Hussein Obama traveled the world bowing to world leaders and apologizing for all of the transgressions of the United States? Well, for Ellison, the days following the hearings could be called the "Ellison Jihad Tour."

From the article:

His emotional testimony, choking back tears as he discussed a Muslim-American first-responder killed on 9/11, garnered national headlines last month for U.S. Rep. Keith Ellison.

But two days after a House committee hearing on Muslim radicalization, the Minnesota Democrat had a far more hostile tone. In a speech in Rochester Hills, Mich., Ellison made a series of personal attacks against three other witnesses who were on the opposite side of the issue.

· He seemed to blame Melvin Bledsoe for the actions of his son Carlos, who stands accused of shooting and killing an Army private after converting to Islam and becoming radicalized.
· A Somali-American who complained about interference from organized Islamist groups while trying to learn about a score of missing young men who turned up with a terrorist group in Somalia was there simply to "diss" the Muslim community in Minneapolis.
· Zuhdi Jasser, a Phoenix physician who challenges the Islamist narrative, simply is out to make a buck, Ellison said.

After stating that he did not want to bring pain to a grieving parent, Ellison appeared to suggest that the bulk of the blame for Carlos Bledsoe's radicalization didn't lie with the jihadists who indoctrinated him, but with his father. Carlos "was in that man's house all his life. He's a Muslim for a few years. Enough said," Ellison said.

Melvin Bledsoe did not mince words when told about Ellison's comments during an interview with the Investigative Project on Terrorism. He dismissed Ellison's notion that radical Islam played no part in his son's actions. Carlos left the Bledsoe home in 2003, changed his name to Abdulhakim Mujahid Muhammad when he converted to Islam a year later, and spent extensive time in Yemen.

You know, Keith Ellison has some nerve in trying to call out the ethics of both Rep. King and these people that testified at the hearings. We're talking here about the first Muslim elected to the House of Representatives who uses his "Muslim name" when he's back in his district but in Washington D.C. and on the news talk shows, he uses his given Christian name.

And I ask you....any so-called Muslim like Ellison who is so quick to turn on his "brothers" like this....well, how comfortable are you in this Congressional member giving you in middle America the truth? If Ellison puts on an act for 9/11, what's he going to do when questioned about the Middle East and Israel?

Keith Ellison's Slurs


His emotional testimony, choking back tears as he discussed a Muslim-American first-responder killed on 9/11, garnered national headlines last month for U.S. Rep. Keith Ellison.

But two days after a House committee hearing on Muslim radicalization, the Minnesota Democrat had a far more hostile tone. In a speech in Rochester Hills, Mich., Ellison made a series of personal attacks against three other witnesses who were on the opposite side of the issue.

· He seemed to blame Melvin Bledsoe for the actions of his son Carlos, who stands accused of shooting and killing an Army private after converting to Islam and becoming radicalized.
· A Somali-American who complained about interference from organized Islamist groups while trying to learn about a score of missing young men who turned up with a terrorist group in Somalia was there simply to "diss" the Muslim community in Minneapolis.
· Zuhdi Jasser, a Phoenix physician who challenges the Islamist narrative, simply is out to make a buck, Ellison said.

His tearful tribute to Mohammed Salman Hamdani came before the House Homeland Security Committee and the national media drawn to the controversial hearing called by Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y. Ellison's attacks on the other witnesses came before a friendlier and more partisan crowd, with sponsors that included the Muslim Students Association (MSA) at the University of Michigan-Dearborn.

The hearing generated controversy because of its focus on radicalization solely among Muslims in America. Committee Democrats criticized King and the hearing's premise, with Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee of Texas saying the proceedings placed the U.S. Constitution "in pain." California Rep. Jackie Speier dismissed the witness testimony as anecdotal.

Ellison's speech echoed that criticism, and he told his Michigan audience that if King "really was trying to learn something about violent radicalization, why wouldn't he include [as a witness] somebody who actually had something to say of value?" Ellison asked. Instead, he called "one guy… named Mr. Bledsoe, whose son I guess became a Muslim, went to Yemen, came back and killed some police officers (sic)."

Bledsoe dropped out of college shortly after his conversion to Islam in 2004. Muslim leaders in Nashville urged him to go to Yemen, long a hotbed of jihadist activity. In 2007 he traveled there, apparently to study under a radical imam.

He is accused of opening fire outside an Army recruiting office in Little Rock, Ark. in June 2009, killing one soldier, Pvt. William Long, and seriously wounding another, Pvt. Quinton Ezeagwula.

In his testimony, Melvin Bledsoe recounted his son's descent into violence, saying the American people are largely unaware of the threat posed by Islamist radicalism. "There is a big elephant in the room, but our society continues not to see it," Bledsoe said.

After stating that he did not want to bring pain to a grieving parent, Ellison appeared to suggest that the bulk of the blame for Carlos Bledsoe's radicalization didn't lie with the jihadists who indoctrinated him, but with his father. Carlos "was in that man's house all his life. He's a Muslim for a few years. Enough said," Ellison said.

Melvin Bledsoe did not mince words when told about Ellison's comments during an interview with the Investigative Project on Terrorism. He dismissed Ellison's notion that radical Islam played no part in his son's actions. Carlos left the Bledsoe home in 2003, changed his name to Abdulhakim Mujahid Muhammad when he converted to Islam a year later, and spent extensive time in Yemen.

"They stole my son," Bledsoe said. "They raped his mind. They changed his thought, his behavior. They changed him from Carlos to Abdulhakim. I asked God to give me my son back."
Ellison is a "fool" and "liar" when he tries to deny the insidious nature of jihadist recruiting that is occurring in this country, Bledsoe said.

In his speech, Ellison expressed similar disdain for Abdirizak Bihi, a Somali American from Minneapolis who also testified. Bihi's teenage nephew Burhan Hassan was shot to death in Somalia in June 2009. Burhan was one of at least 20 Somali men and teenage boys from the Twin Cities area who have traveled to Somalia since 2007 to fight for the terrorist group al-Shabaab. The "only reason" Bihi was invited to testify was "because he's willing to diss the Somali and Muslim community in Minneapolis," Ellison said.

As part of his testimony, Bihi described how Islamist leaders discouraged people from cooperating with the investigation into the missing men. Talking to the FBI could get you sent to Guantanamo Bay, they said. And, there are consequences in the afterlife by being damned with "eternal fire and hell."

Ellison's harshest remarks were reserved for Zuhdi Jasser, president of the American Islamic Forum for Democracy - and like Bihi, a non-Islamist Muslim. Jasser was invited to testify "because he fits the narrative of people who want to defame you," Ellison told his Michigan audience.

Jasser's real goal, he suggested, was to criticize Muslims in order to enrich himself. Ellison said that "if you want to make some money talking about Muslims," follow the example of Ayaan Hirsi Ali.

Hirsi Ali renounced her faith and has been highly critical of it in her writing. A good portion of her money goes to 24-hour-protection since her life was threatened in 2004. When filmmaker Theo Van Gogh was murdered on an Amsterdam street, the killer tacked a note on him saying Hirsi Ali would be next. The two collaborated on "Submission," a short film protesting the treatment of women in Islam.

Ellison said: "You know, I think Zuhdi Jasser just said, 'Why should Ayaan Hirsi Ali make all the money'" criticizing Islam?

In a statement to the Investigative Project on Terrorism, Jasser, a devout Muslim, said he was shocked by the carelessness of Ellison's statements. Ellison engaged in "fabrication and character assassination rather than" debate the issues put forward, Jasser wrote.

"Perhaps it is naïve of me to assume that a sitting member of Congress would maintain a degree of honesty and forthrightness commensurate with his office. Congressman Ellison's false and malignant attacks on my character and integrity speak volumes to the tactics used by leading Islamists in their efforts to marginalize dissent within our Muslim communities," Jasser wrote. "Mr. Ellison's behavior also demonstrates the mudslinging directed toward reform minded Muslims by some leading Muslims threatened by our ideas."

Another Ellison claim about Jasser "is a complete fabrication," said a Des Moines man who was involved in the incident. In October, Drake University hosted a forum on Islam. Ellison claimed that Jasser approached the congressman's son, who was president of the MSA at Drake, and "demanded" to be included in the "What it means to be an American Muslim" event.

Stanley Richards, a philanthropist and sponsor of the event, said that was not true. Jasser was the first person he contacted about attending the forum. Jasser's organization then invited the Drake Muslim Student Association to participate. Ellison's son "informed me that his board had voted not to participate" by sponsoring the forum or serving as a panelist, Richards said.

Ellison's son Isaiah did attend the forum, making statements and asking questions. "Ellison's son spoke with Jasser after the forum and had a respectful conversation," Richards wrote. Rep. Ellison was also invited to be a panelist but declined due to a scheduling conflict.

In his Michigan speech, Ellison claimed he had "gotten to know" Jasser and had had "debate[d]" him in the past. During an October 2009 Capitol Hill briefing on political Islam, the Minnesota congressman slandered Jasser as a bigot seeking to censor Islamists.

Jasser criticized groups like the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) for trying to discredit reports noting the connection between radical Salafism and support for jihad. He said that if Muslims want equal respect and credibility they must "stand for reform within our faith of laws that are still in the 15th and 16th centuries."

Ellison responded to Jasser's call for reform with an angry personal attack in which he virtually called him an Islamic "Uncle Tom."

"I think you give people license for bigotry," Ellison told Jasser. "I think people who want to engage in nothing less than Muslim-hating really love you a lot because you give them freedom to do that."

In Michigan, Ellison continued to mischaracterize Jasser's views and motives. Jasser advocates a "separation between mosque and state" and fights against "political Islam," the application of religious tenets into government and society as espoused by violent jihadists like al-Qaida to political movements like the Muslim Brotherhood.

"By the way, I don't believe that my faith as a Muslim should be politicized," Ellison said. "My faith is way bigger than politics, right? So I don't agree with, but I don't even know what he's even talking about quite frankly. I don't know what he means."

That's surprising, given that groups Ellison works closely with, including the Muslim American Society (MAS) was founded by Muslim Brotherhood members in the United States. MAS even paid for Ellison to travel to Mecca for the hajj in 2008.

Brotherhood bylaws show its adherence to political Islam, calling for "the need to work on establishing the Islamic State, which seeks to effectively implement the provisions of Islam and its teachings."

Court records show that CAIR, meanwhile, was created by a Hamas-support network in America created by the Muslim Brotherhood.

Ellison repeatedly defended CAIR in his Michigan speech, saying it is "a legally operating organization" that would have been shut down had it done anything wrong. He failed to tell his audience that the FBI severed formal relations with CAIR nearly three years ago, due to questions about its founders' ties to the Hamas-support network known as the Palestine Committee. FBI Director Robert Mueller has repeated this position twice in the past month before congressional panels.

In court papers, prosecutors wrote that CAIR was "a participant in an ongoing and ultimately unlawful conspiracy to support a designated terrorist organization, a conspiracy from which CAIR never withdrew."

The Congressman cannot blame Jasser or the other witnesses for that.

Here's the Deal...Christians and Jews Are Supposed To Appreciate Islam....While Muslims Are Free To Despise Christianity and Judaism

This article at Family Security Matters set off something in me that's been nagging at me for quite awhile...this movement across America that not only demands that we tolerate Islam but that we embrace and accept it, but I see no evidence that American Muslims have lifted one finger to accept or embrace my Christianity or my brothers and sisters of Judaism. I am being asked (forcefully) to embrace the fact that a woman of Islam HAS to wear a hijab at work when it violates the work dress code but when I try to wear a crucifix outside of my clothing, it is deemed "offensive" to Muslim coworkers. Am I the only one seeing this?

The article deals with what is going on in a form of appeasement at Divinity Schools in America and focuses on a speech given by Imam Rauf. Here's an excerpt from the article:

Moreover, there is an inherent hypocrisy in his approach that the left wing Divinity School embraces as well. While there is much said about understanding and cooperation, the onus is put on Jewish students to appreciate Islam, but there isn’t any expectation that Muslims should learn to appreciate the Judeo-Christian tradition of the West.

Islam relies on the Constitutional guarantee of the First Amendment to challenge the most basic and fundamental precepts of constitutionalism. Islam does not recognize the separation of church and state. Islam doesn’t have any provision for the protection of individual rights. Islam systematically subjugates women and refuses to offer them the full protection of the law. Are these conditions which should be embraced by the Jews at Yale’s Divinity School?

There is a difference in allowing someone to worship the way they choose and being forced to acknowledge that they have legitimacy. There is a difference between respecting someone's rights in this Country and affording them special rights. Perhaps this is all due to an inherent part of America to open its arms to anyone here...we certainly have seen immigrants from every possible walk of life come to our shores and it's the American way to open our arms and do our best to give them space.

However, it is unAmerican to treat one group differently than another and what is unique in this situation is that the Muslims are the first group to push the envelope...the first to demand UNIQUE rights and UNIQUE status. The terms "racism in America" is all encompassing - you can have people racist towards blacks but also whites or Asians or American Indians or hispanics. But in the year 2011, we have the term "islamophobe." We now have a word in our country that refers only to the treatment of Muslims. Yep, they even have their own word now.

The Divinity Dupes at Yale


Hucksterism is alive and well and residing at Divinity Schools in universities across the country. In fact, these institutions designed to provide instruction on religious practice have become centers for the promotion of leftist ideology and now Islamism.

On March 23 Imam Feisal Rauf, founder and chairman of the Cordoba Initiative, what some have called the mosque at the World Trade Center site, spoke at Yale on “religious tolerance and interfaith cooperation.” The discussion, organized by Jews and Muslims at Yale, was moderated by Rabbi James Ponet, head of the Slifka Center for Jewish Life.

Imam Rauf has received international attention for the Cordoda Initiative with adherents and opponents aroused by the ensuing controversy. Rauf claims to foster strong ties and friendship among different religious faiths, but in all instances the understanding is a one-way street with Jews presumably coming to appreciate the unique contributions of Islam.

Having heard Imam Rauf speak, his soft and mellifluous tone conceals positions consistent with radical Islam. For example, during deliberations about the mosque near the World Trade Center site, Rauf refused to criticize Hamas as a terrorist organization, even though it is listed as a terrorist group by our State Department. He refuses as well to recognize the incompatibility between sharia – which he espouses – and Constitutional precedents in the United States.

Rauf attempts to convince his audience of his ironic intentions with reference to his enthusiasm for the New York Giants football team, his having grown up in New Jersey and his love of the United States. But what remains unclear, in fact what is intentionally enigmatic, is whether this love of America trumps his love for Islam and the totalistic demands of the religion.

Moreover, there is an inherent hypocrisy in his approach that the left wing Divinity School embraces as well. While there is much said about understanding and cooperation, the onus is put on Jewish students to appreciate Islam, but there isn’t any expectation that Muslims should learn to appreciate the Judeo-Christian tradition of the West.

Islam relies on the Constitutional guarantee of the First Amendment to challenge the most basic and fundamental precepts of constitutionalism. Islam does not recognize the separation of church and state. Islam doesn’t have any provision for the protection of individual rights. Islam systematically subjugates women and refuses to offer them the full protection of the law. Are these conditions which should be embraced by the Jews at Yale’s Divinity School?

Admittedly there are portions of the Koran which display a desire for cooperation in what is sometimes described as the Mecca period. However, Islam also applies the law of abrogation suggesting that what came later (even though the Koran is not written chronologically) is be superordinated over what came earlier. As a consequence, the Medina period in which violence is advocated and Verses of the Sword are regarded as more significant than the earlier peaceful episode in Islam’s evolution.

But did Imam Rauf mention this matter in his peroration? Of course not. Will Yale students challenge him on this matter? Of course not. Will this event be heralded as a peaceful exchange designed to promote understanding? Of that I haven’t the slightest doubt.

In fact, this should be described as Rauf’s Grand Sharia Tour Across America. It is a mission aimed at the useful dupes in the Academy who will accept his pronouncements. As I see it, the secret that won’t be revealed and is “a third rail” in discussion is that the American left and Islam have very little in common ideologically, except for one matter: hatred of the American system and our way of life.

Islam - the Enemy of Freedom and Liberty

For years here I have tried to portray Islam as the enemy of America's liberty and freedoms and that Islam's goal, the written goal of the Qur'an, is world domination and yes, that includes the domination of American society and culture. I've done my best to sound the warnings, I've done my best to reveal Islam as an ideology and not a religion. We've looked at the political side of Islam that simply cannot be separated out and we have showcased sharia law and just what that would mean to a naive American society.

Well, this article at Family Security Matters does another terrific job of outlining more examples and evidence as to the adversarial aspect of Islam to American ideals of liberty and freedom.

From the article:

A great irony of the age is that the seemingly most diehard proponents of freedom— the useful idiots of our time—are the most dangerous unwitting accomplices of liberty’s enemy—Islam. Keep in mind that the very name “Islam” is a derivation of “taslim,” the Arabic word for “surrender,” surrender to the will and dictates of Allah as revealed by Muhammad and recorded in the Quran.

This non-negotiable surrender to Islam requires the individual as well as the society to disenfranchise themselves of many of the fundamental and deeply cherished human rights.

* slam actively suppresses and even prohibits the practice of other religions, including those of the “people of the book,” Jews and Christians. There is not a single church or synagogue in the cradle of Islam, Saudi Arabia, while thousands of mosques dot the tolerating and welcoming non-Moslem lands. Islamic countries that allow for Jewish and Christian places of worship subject these “people of the book” to numberless subtle and not-so-subtle forms of persecution. Moslems in non-Moslem lands proselytize relentlessly and convert others while any Moslem who leaves Islam is judged as apostate and automatically condemned to death.

* Freedom of speech is just about non-existent in Islam. The word is Allah’s, his chosen divines such as Ayatollahs and Imams are the only ones who are to make pronouncements squarely-based on Allah’s word, the Quran. Any expression in the least at deviance from the Quran, the Hadith and the edicts of Islamic high divines is heresy and severely punishable. Hence, stifling of free expression is the major mechanism by which the Islamic clergy retain power and prevent constructive change in Islamic societies.

You will see in the rest of the article that example after example of more violations of freedom by Islam - soak it in and make it real. And as you read through this, remember one thing - there is no such thing as "fundamental" Islam and Islam "light." There is no Americanized version of Islam that will bring this "religion" to our shores and yet it will adhere to our Constitution and our rights of liberty, justice and freedom. Islam is Islam. The Qur'an is the Qur'an.

Islam is the Enemy of Freedom


A great irony of the age is that the seemingly most diehard proponents of freedom— the useful idiots of our time—are the most dangerous unwitting accomplices of liberty’s enemy—Islam. Keep in mind that the very name “Islam” is a derivation of “taslim,” the Arabic word for “surrender,” surrender to the will and dictates of Allah as revealed by Muhammad and recorded in the Quran.

This non-negotiable surrender to Islam requires the individual as well as the society to disenfranchise themselves of many of the fundamental and deeply cherished human rights.

Below is a brief presentation of what this surrender to Islam entails and why it is imperative that all freedom-loving people arise and defeat the menace of Islamofascism.

Amendment I of the Bill of Rights enshrines some of the most cherished ideals of freedom-loving people:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

Islam considers itself the three branches of government. It enacts laws as it sees fit, adjudicates laws, and executes as it deems. Islam is anathema to the provisions of the First Amendment and much more.


* Islam proclaims itself as the only legitimate religion for the entire world, grudgingly granting minor recognition to Judaism and Christianity from whom it has liberally plagiarized many of its dogma. Jews and Christians are allowed to live under the rule of Islam as dhimmis and must pay a special religious tax of jazyyeh. Buddhists, Hindus, Zoroastrians, Baha’is, members of other religions, agnostics, or atheists are not even allowed to live practicing their belief or disbelief.

* Islam actively suppresses and even prohibits the practice of other religions, including those of the “people of the book,” Jews and Christians. There is not a single church or synagogue in the cradle of Islam, Saudi Arabia, while thousands of mosques dot the tolerating and welcoming non-Moslem lands. Islamic countries that allow for Jewish and Christian places of worship subject these “people of the book” to numberless subtle and not-so-subtle forms of persecution. Moslems in non-Moslem lands proselytize relentlessly and convert others while any Moslem who leaves Islam is judged as apostate and automatically condemned to death.

* Freedom of speech is just about non-existent in Islam. The word is Allah’s, his chosen divines such as Ayatollahs and Imams are the only ones who are to make pronouncements squarely-based on Allah’s word, the Quran. Any expression in the least at deviance from the Quran, the Hadith and the edicts of Islamic high divines is heresy and severely punishable. Hence, stifling of free expression is the major mechanism by which the Islamic clergy retain power and prevent constructive change in Islamic societies.

* Freedom of the press is completely alien to Islam, since a free press tends to express matters as it sees it, rather than as it is stated in the Quran. To Islam, the Quran is the press and the only press. There is no need for critical reporting, no need to present ideas that may conflict with the Quran, and no place for criticism of anything Islamic. The stranglehold of Islam on the individual and society is complete.

* Peaceful assembly of the people is not allowed. The backward oppressive Islamic societies inflict great hardship on the citizenry and any assembly of the victims presents a threat to the suffocating rule. Islamic governments routinely prevent peaceful assemblies from taking place. Failing to do so, they unleash their hired thugs, the police and even the military against any assemblage no matter how peaceful and how legitimate is its grievance. The Islamic Republic of Iran which is vying with Saudi Arabia as the leader of true Islamic rule, routinely attacks any and all gatherings of its people, arrests them, imprisons them without due process, tortures them, and even executes them in secret dungeons. Journalists, academics, unionists, students, teachers, women rights groups who dare to petition the government for redress are labeled subversive and are severely punished.

* Maltreatment of religious minorities and the non-religious is criminal indeed. In the Islamic Republic of Iran, for instance, the government has launched a systematic program of genocide against its largest religious minority—the Baha’is. The government is gathering a comprehensive list of Baha’is, their occupations, locations, properties and the like—action reminiscent of the Nazis. The government is banning Baha’i students from post high-school education unless they recant their religion, deprives them of engaging in numerous forms of occupations and trades, denies them from holding worship gatherings, razes their holy places and much more. The Islamic Republic of Iran is not satisfied with its cruel treatment of the living Baha’is and has launched a war on their dead by bulldozing Baha’i cemeteries in several cities. Thus is the rule of fundamental Islamism that is awaiting the complacent and snoozing world.

* Oppression of women in general is tragic indeed. Men are allowed to have as many as four wives simultaneously and as many concubines as they wish or can afford. Men can easily divorce their wives and automatically have the custody of the children, if they so decide. Women have subservient status to men in all areas of the law. Equality under the law has no meaning in Islam. Just one example of the dreadful way of treating women in Islam is a case of a Saudi woman who was gang-raped. The Islamic court convicted the woman to prison term and lashes for having committed the “sin” of riding in a car with a male who was not her relative. This is a standard form of Islamic Shariah justice—a savage heritage of barbarism that ruled the Arabian Peninsula some centuries ago.

* Islam has a solution for every “problem.” It deals with homosexuals, for instance, by hanging them en mass and gloating about it, even though homosexuality is just as prevalent in Islamic lands as anywhere else. Recently an Ayatollah made a ruling on homosexuals. He said that they should be tortured before they are hanged. In Islam the rulings of high-ranking clergy constitute the law and are binding.

* Not only Islam does not allow freedom of assembly and the press, it is intrusively restrictive in every aspects of a person’s life. The way women should dress, the haircut of men, the music people are allowed, movies to watch, television programs to view, and even parties in the privacy of their home are subject to the ridiculous monitoring of moral police. Islam is hell-bent on outward morality and puritanical conduct while it is rotten to the core just below the pretentious surface.

* Islam segregates by gender many public places and events such as beaches, sporting venues, public transportations, and even building elevators. Families are often prevented from attending a sporting event together or swimming together at a beach.

* Egypt, the crown of the Arab-Islam world, demands that citizens declare Islam or only one of the two other religions, Jewish and Christianity, as their religion in order to receive the government-issued identity cards. ID cards are required for jobs, healthcare, education, a marriage license and a host of other things. If you are an agnostic, an atheist, a Buddhist, a Hindu, a Baha’i, you are forced to perjure yourself to receive the indispensable ID card. In a real sense, Islam the pretender of high moral ground compels people to lie in order to receive what is their birthright as citizens.

I have been sounding the alarm about Islam’s imminent deadly threat for a number of years. The Islamic treasury flush with oil extortion money together with the help of useful idiots is having the upper hand in this battle of survival for freedom. The slaveholder Islam has been transformed into a more virulent form of Islamofascism; it is an inveterate unrelenting enemy of freedom. We need to act now and stem the tide of this deadly threat. Tomorrow may be too late. Freedom is too precious to abandon through complacency, acts of political correctness, or outright cowardice.

Why Is Rep. Peter King Holding the Islamic Terror Hearings? Because the Statistics DEMAND It

This story from Family Security Matters does a good job of pointing out the overwhelming statistical evidence of islamic terror links throughout the U.S. and any rational person, after reading this article, would totally concur with the hearings that are being held by Rep. Peter King starting today. Let me throw out one of the statistics:

Though Muslims represent about 1 percent of the American population, they constitute defendants in 186 of the 228 cases DOJ lists.

See that? If you had 228 total rapists in a prison and 186 of them were between the ages of 18 and 20, wouldn't you conclude that you need to target 18 to 20 year old men in your community for rapist prevention? Or would you just ignore that statistical evidence and figure it's a coincidence?

More from the article:

The Investigative Project on Terrorism analysis involved reviewing the Justice Department's list of more than 400 successful terrorism-related prosecutions from Sept. 11, 2001, through March 18, 2010. Those cases that demonstrated defendants with a clear Islamist agenda were placed in that category, while those without a clear tie to radical Islam were excluded. In some cases, defendants with Arabic-sounding names were excluded from the Islamist category, because no definitive tie could be made.

As the DOJ statistics cover cases prosecuted through March 2010, a series of homegrown Islamist terrorist plots thwarted in the last year are not included. For example, Jordanian Hossam Smadi pleaded guilty in May 2010 to attempting to use a weapon of mass destruction to blow up Fountain Place, a well-recognized skyscraper in downtown Dallas. In September of 2009, Smadi parked a vehicle loaded with what he thought was a live bomb underneath the building. After moving several blocks away from the building, he used a cell phone to detonate the explosive device. Smadi was unaware that the device, provided by the FBI, was inert.

I just heard this morning on the news that Peter King is having to order more security for the hearings - isn't that case enough for having the hearings? The outcry from Muslims is that they are being targeted by this - well, I'll make the case that WE INFIDELS are being targeted by them! The difference is one of us gets a hearing, and one of us gets shrapnel through our head.

Let's hope that the message comes out of these hearings that America truly is under attack and that the links to islamic terror are wide and deep throughout our country and most importantly, there are dozens and dozens of islamic groups in this country whose mission it is to cover it all up.

Islamists Dominate DOJ's List of Terror Prosecutions


More than 80 percent of all convictions tied to international terrorist groups and homegrown terrorism since 9/11 involve defendants driven by a radical Islamist agenda, a review of Department of Justice statistics shows.

Though Muslims represent about 1 percent of the American population, they constitute defendants in 186 of the 228 cases DOJ lists.

On Thursday, the House Homeland Security Committee holds its first hearing into radicalization among Muslim Americans. Critics have taken issue with the focus on one religious minority, but the DOJ list shows that radical Islamists are disproportionately involved in terror-related crimes.

Al-Qaida is involved in the largest number of prosecutions, representing 30 percent of the 228 terror cases involving an identified group. Hizballah-affiliated defendants are involved in 10.5 percent of the cases and Hamas is part of 9 percent. Pakistani-based Lashkar-e-Tayyiba was involved in 6.5 percent of the cases.

The Tamil Tigers in Sri Lanka and the Colombian FARC lead the non-Islamist terrorist groups, combining for 14 percent of the total.

The Investigative Project on Terrorism analysis involved reviewing the Justice Department's list of more than 400 successful terrorism-related prosecutions from Sept. 11, 2001, through March 18, 2010. Those cases that demonstrated defendants with a clear Islamist agenda were placed in that category, while those without a clear tie to radical Islam were excluded. In some cases, defendants with Arabic-sounding names were excluded from the Islamist category, because no definitive tie could be made.

To see the individual case listings, and those which were considered Islamist in nature, click here. To see a separate rundown of more than 30 terror-related prosecution activity in 2010 alone, click here.

The cases listed by DOJ are divided between those involving direct support for terrorist plots or organizations, and those where investigations "involved an identified link to international terrorism" but the resulting indictments and complaints involved charges such as fraud, immigration violations, firearms, drugs, false statements and obstruction of justice.

Among all cases, an Islamist connection was found in at least 46 percent. An almost equal percentage, however, involved cases listed by the DOJ as terror-related, but in which there was insufficient information to determine whether a person was tied to an Islamist cause. In many, it was unclear why the case was included on a list of terror-related prosecutions.

The list emphasizes international terror, so domestic extremist groups like the Hutaree militia and eco-terrorists are not included.

Thirty of the terror cases listed, or about 13 percent, involve homegrown Islamist terrorists.

As the DOJ statistics cover cases prosecuted through March 2010, a series of homegrown Islamist terrorist plots thwarted in the last year are not included. For example, Jordanian Hossam Smadi pleaded guilty in May 2010 to attempting to use a weapon of mass destruction to blow up Fountain Place, a well-recognized skyscraper in downtown Dallas. In September of 2009, Smadi parked a vehicle loaded with what he thought was a live bomb underneath the building. After moving several blocks away from the building, he used a cell phone to detonate the explosive device. Smadi was unaware that the device, provided by the FBI, was inert.

The FBI gained interest in Smadi while monitoring a radical group online. According to the government, Smadi's "vehement intention" to carry out terrorist attacks on U.S. soil separated him from others in the group. Smadi's statements exhibited his Islamist beliefs. "To sacrifice in person is the best type of jihad," "Oh how I love, my brothers, to perform jihad with you in the same rank, in the same field against the same enemy" and statements of support for al-Qaida leaders like Osama bin Laden are just some examples given in a criminal complaint.

Similarly, the FBI arrested several men last fall in separate incidents who had attracted scrutiny due to their expressed desire to participate in violent jihad. Upon sending in agents to investigate further, the FBI discovered the men were all ready to take their rhetoric to the operational level. Farooque Ahmed plotted to attack the Washington, D.C. Metro system, Antonio Martinez targeted a military recruitment center in Maryland and Mohamed Osman Mohamud, tried to bomb a Portland, Ore. Christmas tree-lighting ceremony.

Prosecutors say Ahmed had been "inquiring about making contact with a terrorist organization in order to participate in jihad" overseas. He told someone he thought was a terrorist operative that he wanted to kill Americans in Afghanistan. He replied "of course" when the operative asked whether he wanted to become a martyr.

In a posting on his Facebook page, Martinez exclaimed that "The sword is cumin the reign of oppression is about 2 cease inshallah ta'ala YA mulismeen! Don't except the free world we are slaves of the Most High and never forget it!"

Mohamud attempted to contact an associate in Pakistan to make plans to travel abroad to prepare for violent jihad and wrote pieces for "Jihad Recollections," an online publication which condones violent jihad.

Nor does the DOJ list include pending cases, like the prosecution of seven North Carolina men who tried to wage jihad abroad and then talked of shifting to domestic targets when that didn't work, and most of the prosecutions of more than 20 people charged with providing material support for the Somali terrorist group al-Shabaab.

Examples of cases included in the DOJ list with direct ties to international terrorism include failed airplane bomber Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab and Lashkar-e-Tayyiba operative David Headley, who scouted targets for the 2009 Mumbai attacks.

Cases not directly tied to terrorism but that indirectly helped aid terrorist activity, include Sabri Benkahla, who was convicted in February 2007 on charges of lying to a grand jury, obstruction of justice and making a false statement. Benkahla was part of the "Virginia jihad network" of young Muslim men who played paintball to train for jihad against nations hostile to Islam, including the United States. The group's spiritual leader Ali Al-Timimi is serving a life sentence for inciting terrorist activity by urging followers to wage jihad against American forces in Afghanistan.

In another case, Fawaz Damra, former imam of the Islamic Center of Cleveland, was convicted by a federal jury in 2004 of lying on his naturalization application about his involvement with the Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ), a designated terrorist organization. Evidence presented at his trial included a 1991 speech in which Damra called Jews "the sons of monkeys and pigs" and openly raised money for the PIJ. Damra was subsequently stripped off his U.S. citizenship and deported to the Palestinian territories.

The DOJ list does not demonstrate that vast segments of the Muslim community constitute a threat to carry out terrorist attacks or support groups which do. Assuming a Muslim American population of about 5 million people, the DOJ cases amount to .000004 percent of the community.

However, it is clear that Islamist terrorist movements have been successful in getting support from extremists in the United States. As other recent hearings have shown, more sophisticated online recruitment has helped lure more people to seek jihad.

Unless that trend changes, the DOJ data likely will grow even more disproportionate.

The Islamic Strategy To Take Over America Using Creeping Sharia Is Gaining Ground

This is a lengthy article from Family Security Matters but it is ESSENTIAL that all of you read it from top to bottom - share this message with your family, with your friends, with your coworkers. Print this story out and send it to your local city council members, your state legislators and your Congressional Reps. and Senators. This nation of ours needs to come together in the knowledge of how the enemy is attacking us. And we need to know this strategy....NOW.

America's Peril: Islamic Extremists' War Strategy Gaining Ground


After Japan’s devastating surprise attack against the US at Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941, concerns arose over the ability of a seriously wounded American Navy to defend our country against a future attack, let alone challenge Tokyo’s control of the Pacific. Over the following three and a half years, those concerns proved unwarranted as we became very effective at taking the fight to the Japanese, who—in launching their military strategy—never again achieved the tactical surprise they did at Pearl Harbor. While the resolve and courage of our fighting forces was a factor, so too was the fact we had—unbeknownst to the Japanese—broken their naval code. Accordingly, almost every move the Japanese made on their tactical chessboard was eventually checked by an Allied counter-move, leading to one Japanese defeat after another. Meanwhile, in the European theater, the Allies achieved a similar intelligence windfall (known as “Ultra”) after breaking Germany’s code. It prompted Winston Churchill at the war’s end to comment, “It was thanks to Ultra we won….”

Clearly, when an enemy secretly lays out its strategic plans as to how it intends to defeat us, and we learn of the tactics it will use before they can be employed, it provides us with an enormous opportunity to deny that enemy success by countering its strategy. In the Islamist war against the US, this has happened with the discovery seven years ago of a hidden document on how America’s Constitution will be replaced by shariah law. Interestingly, the document in question was written well before 9/11. Perhaps because the strategy appeared so outlandish, we have not embraced the intentions of Islamists with the same concern we did for those of our enemies during World War II. By failing to do so, we have allowed the Islamist strategy to gain traction, with the first signs of its success already visible.

In 2004, Ismail Elbarasse—a Muslim Brotherhood leader living in Annandale, Virginia—came under suspicion by the FBI when he and his wife were observed filming the Chesapeake Bay Bridge. While tourists often film the bridge for its scenic beauty, the focus of Elbarasse’s film seemed to be less on that and more on weaknesses in its engineering structure. A subsequent raid of his home uncovered a secret sub-basement containing a treasure trove of documents in Arabic, representing the archives of the US branch of the fundamentalist and militant organization Muslim Brotherhood. Translation of the documents clearly indicated a conspiracy was underway to take control of America, using the introduction of sharia law as the vehicle for doing so.

The Muslim Brotherhood, founded in Egypt in 1928, today is the world’s most influential Islamist movement. Its slogan “Islam is the solution” is not meant to apply to just the Arab world as it seeks to have Prophet Muhammed’s sayings and influence obtain a global reach. Their ultimate goal is that all non-believers convert to Islam—or face the consequences of a global Islamic society that is intolerant of them.

There is debate over whether or not the Brotherhood embraces violence to achieve its goals. While it allegedly has renounced violence, according to teachings of the Prophet Muhammed believers can lie to or otherwise deceive non-believers about their intentions when necessary to further the cause of Islam. While giving the appearance of renouncing violence, the Brotherhood has given birth to many splinter groups that do embrace violence. Arguably, this was done with its tacit blessing.

This debate has created some confusion—although it should not at the US national security level—as evidenced by Director of National Intelligence James Clapper’s recent claim the Brotherhood is “largely secular.” While Clapper’s Congressional testimony about the Brotherhood last month chose to downplay the organization’s religious underpinnings, even the CIA’s website describes it as a “religious-based” party.

In September 2010, a non-partisan panel of national security experts issued a report entitled “Sharia: The Threat to America.” It quoted a 1987 document found hidden in Elbarasse’s basement containing the Brotherhood’s strategic plan by Brotherhood member and senior Hamas leader Mohammed Akram. Clearly stated in this document was the Brotherhood’s mission:

“The process of settlement is a ‘civilization-jihadist process’ with all the word means. The Ikhwan (brothers of an Islamic religious militia) must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and ‘sabotaging’ its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God’s religion is made victorious over all other religions.”

The report stated the Islamist strategy

“for destroying the United States is to get us, specifically our leadership, to do the bidding of the MB for them. The Muslim Brotherhood intends to conduct Civilization Jihad by co-opting our leadership into believing a counterfactual understanding of Islam and the nature of the Muslim Brotherhood, thereby coercing these leaders to enforce the MB narrative on their subordinates.”

The report urged the White House to make clear what the document states—radical Muslims are using Islamic law to subvert the US. But, six months after the report was issued, the Obama Administration has yet to do so out of a ridiculous concern that mentioning an Islamic link will offend moderates.

According to the non-partisan report, the Islamist document calls for the Islamist’s strategy plan to be slowly implemented in phases that enable shariah to “creep” into US culture. To work, it requires Muslims gain influence in various ways including: expanding Muslims’ physical presence here via high birth rates, immigration and refusing to assimilate; keeping locals “in the dark” over human right infringement by ensuring they do not study shariah doctrine and its impact; controlling the language Muslims use to describe us (non-Muslims) as the enemy lest it raise our concern; forcing compliance with shariah at local levels; employing the offensive use of lawsuits and threats of lawsuits to silence critics of Islam; claiming Muslim victimization; subverting the US education system through the introduction of dominant US Middle East studies programs; demanding the right to practice shariah in segregated Muslim enclaves and demanding its recognition in non-Muslim spheres; and (ultimately) demanding that shariah replace Western law.

Every single one of these tactics has been employed to date by members of the Muslim community promoting the Brotherhood’s agenda. In 2002, two US universities accepted $20 million dollar donations from a Saudi prince in exchange for a commitment to establish programs in Islamic studies. Last year, a New Jersey criminal court judge applied shariah law to find a Muslim husband not guilty of having raped his Muslim wife as Islamic law demands a wife submit to her husband’s sexual desires. In Minneapolis, home to a large community of unassimilated Somali immigrants, Muslim taxi drivers refuse to transport passengers carrying alcohol and other Muslim communities are seeking the application to them of shariah. And today, as Rep. Peter King (R-NY) seeks to hold hearings on Islamic extremism and how it radicalizes Muslims, he is being targeted by Muslim groups opposed to such hearings.

Earlier this month, British Imam Anjem Choudary, who has praised the 9/11 terrorists, was interviewed concerning his desire to come to the US to work for the implementation of shariah law here. With such implementation already partially successful in the UK (for civil cases), Choudary seeks to do the same in the US. He is the same person who, in 2006, condemned the Pope to death for simply quoting a Byzantine emperor’s negative observation about Prophet Muhammad. One need not imagine the harsh reality and absence of humanity Choudary envisions for a shariah- compliant US—one need only look at what happened last week in Egypt—a country where the Muslim Brotherhood is very well organized.

In the village of Soul, just 30 kilometers from Cairo, a Christian Copt church was attacked and burned by a mob of 4000 Muslims shouting “Allahu Akbar.” It was triggered due to a relationship entered into by a Copt man and Muslim woman. The Copt’s house was torched to punish the man. But when the Muslim woman’s father refused to kill his daughter to restore the family’s honor, a cousin murdered the reluctant father. To avenge the father’s death, the woman’s brother then killed the cousin. Meanwhile, Muslims vow to conduct morning prayers at the site of the razed church. Under shariah law, insanity runs rampant.

Choudary claimed in an interview that the imposition of shariah is necessary to rid the US of corruption. But the hypocrisy of such a claim is evidenced by implementation of shariah in its severest form in a country—Iran—where religious leaders have become among world’s wealthiest through unparalleled corruption.

Playing into the Muslim Brotherhood’s strategy is the push to build the Ground Zero Mosque. Just like the Soviet sympathizers living in the West during the Cold war who naively worked to further communist goals, a new generation of “useful idiots” have evolved, naively working to further the Brotherhood’s goals.

The Ground Zero Mosque effort is dubbed the “Cordoba Initiative” by its Muslim sponsors who suggest they seek to bring back the atmosphere of “interfaith tolerance and respect that we have longed for since Muslims, Christians and Jews lived together in harmony and prosperity eight hundred years ago.” This smacks of deception as no such harmony or prosperity existed in Islamic Spain for non-Muslims as they were forced to submit to Islam. And, in keeping with a practice followed by conquering Islamic armies a millennium ago, a battle’s victory is to be memorialized by constructing a mosque at the site where it was won. Therefore, building a Ground Zero Mosque is very symbolic and meaningful to Islamic extremists, such as the Brotherhood.

It is interesting to further note, if one peels back the complex layers of Muslim groups and individuals pressing for construction of the Mosque (in opposition to American sentiments about the location), links to the Brotherhood are exposed. And, as Rep. King’s hearings will demonstrate, imams at such mosques play a significant role in radicalizing Muslims in the US.

During World War II, we were able to learn in advance of the enemy’s war strategy. We have gained a similar intelligence upper hand today, learning about the war strategy of Islamic extremists determined to replace our Constitution with shariah law by using our system against us.

There is a big difference, however, between then and now. In World War II, we made use of that intelligence to defeat the Japanese and Germans; today, we ignore it, allowing the enemy’s shariah law to chip away at our Constitution.

Sadly, we are in great peril and fail to even understand it.

Washington, D.C. Radio Station Sends the Clear Message: CAIR and Other Muslim Groups Have More Rights Than Infidel Americans

It's becoming very clear just how far along we are in the process of islamification of America and just how accelerated the aspect of "islamophobia" has taken hold in our country. Just this past week, we saw another voice of reason in the fight against radical islam being removed from America's radio airwaves when Fred Grandy and his wife are no longer broadcasting their warnings against the onslaught of islam at the radio station, WMAL.

Here's the cut to the chase recap - Fred Grandy's wife who shares the program with him made a speech off air recently where she warned harshly of the threat of radical islam. Shortly after that speech, the islamic terror group, CAIR, which is costumed as some sort of American Muslim outreach group, complained about Mrs. Grandy. She was fired by WMAL. Fred Grandy stood up for his wife and resigned from WMAL.

And this shows just once more that if an islamic group rattles enough cages, if they beat their chests and claimed repression because they are Muslim....they get their way.

Now, you will see in the article below from Family Security Matters that some folks are beginning a campaign of protest against WMAL for these blatant actions of discrimination and bowing to islamophobia, but I ask the question - isn't it time that CAIR pays the price for these actions? How many times will the Council on American-Islamic Relations voice their complaints or file lawsuits and walk away unscathed? Will CAIR spokesman Ibrahim Hooper (former Christian news producer Doug Hooper) continue to be able to play the dumb card?

The point here is that the actions of CAIR and other islamic groups need to be unveiled. The lawsuits and accusations and threats by these groups need to see the hot lights of exposure. We all need to point the finger at them and make it clear to every single American that these groups are the very enemy of our Constitution...they are our enemy when it comes to personal liberties and they are our enemy in trying to establish sharia law in America. How many of you know Ibrahim Hooper? Would you recognize his picture? Do you know anything about him? Do me a favor...go to Google and try and find ANYTHING about Doug Hooper before he converted to islam and became Ibrahim Hooper - can't find anything? Well, like the other excrement from CAIR, Hooper lives in a world of secrecy and lies. And it is time to shine the bright light on everyone of these CAIR hacks - it's like turning the kitchen light on in a cockroach infested apartment at 3 a.m. It's way past time that the actions of these instigators and thugs were publicized and featured.

If we don't take the enemy on soon, you will see dozens and dozens of Fred Grandys are off the air. You see, CAIR is not shy in their goal - their goal is to shut down the education of Americans as to the dangers and threat of radical islam in this country. Are you willing to let them achieve that goal?

Did Muslim Lobby Force Firing of Popular Radio Host?


Washington, D.C. radio station WMAL is once again being accused of firing a popular talk-show host because of his criticism of radical Muslims. The station, a major source of news and information for the nation’s capital, claims that popular morning host Fred Grandy resigned on his own, but Grandy tells AIM that he was essentially forced to leave after his wife, who is also outspoken about radical Islam, was cut from the program.

The growing controversy over Grandy’s departure has resulted in some Grandy supporters charging the station with being “Sharia-compliant,” a reference to Islamic law, and with bending under pressure from the Council on American Islamic-Relations (CAIR), a Muslim lobbying organization that combats what it calls “Islamophobia” in the media.

Grandy, a former actor and Republican member of Congress, told AIM, “My wife and I have used our program over the last several months to warn about the spread of radical Islam at home and abroad. Last week, Catherine (known on the show as Mrs. Fred) delivered a very tough indictment against stealth jihad, and for her efforts she was told she was off the show. I then told management without Mrs. Fred at the microphone, I could not remain either and have resigned effective this morning.”

A WMAL statement, which makes no mention of terminating “Mrs. Fred,” was released on Thursday and claimed that “Fred Grandy has informed WMAL of his intention to resign from the station and its morning program, The Grandy Group. Veteran broadcast talent Bryan Nehman will continue to anchor the morning program and in the interim will be joined by several notable guest hosts and regular contributors. The station’s morning show will also continue to provide the latest news, traffic and weather reports to its audience. WMAL remains committed to its goal of providing a forum for discussing a broad spectrum of issues while delivering compelling programming including Chris Plante, Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, and Mark Levin.”

The statement on the Grandy matter was read on the air by another WMAL host, Chris Plante, who said that his broadcast opposition to radical Islam has not been curtailed in any way.

Grandy told AIM, “We cannot affirmatively conclude CAIR or any of the prominent Islamic organizations had anything to do with this. We do know, however, in 2005 representatives of CAIR in DC were successful in getting midmorning host Michael Graham fired for anti-Islamic statements he had made on the radio and TV.”

Graham was fired from WMAL after describing Islam as a “terrorist organization” on his program and refusing to apologize or modify the description.

James Lafferty of the Virginia Anti-Shariah Task Force, who insists that Grandy was “forced to walk away” from his program after the banning of his wife from the show, blames the controversy on CAIR. “CAIR frequently criticized Grandy for reading FBI reports and court documents on his radio show which labeled CAIR as ‘an unindicted co-conspirator’ in the federal Holy Land Foundation terror finance trial,” Lafferty said.

But CAIR Communications Director Ibrahim Hooper acted surprised by the news of Grandy’s resignation and responded, “What is their evidence for that claim?,” when informed that his group was being blamed for his departure.

Lafferty told AIM, “I heard from two very good sources that CAIR was involved in this and not only targeting Grandy but Sean Hannity.” He said CAIR’s strategy was to knock Grandy off the air and then go after Hannity, a nationally syndicated radio host carried by WMAL in the afternoon. Hannity also hosts a Fox News Channel TV show.

Lafferty has urged supporters of the Grandys to protest on Monday, March 7, and Tuesday, March 8, during “Call Out WMAL Days.” He wants the public to call WMAL at (202) 895-2350 and (202) 686-3100 from 9 a.m. to 6 p.m. each of those days and tell the station, “you will not listen to their station until Fred and Mrs. Fred Grandy return.”

“America expects radio stations to be committed to free speech and the truth,” he says. “We expect WMAL to grow a backbone and stand up to CAIR and the other radicals. Call early and often.”

At 10 a.m. Wednesday, March 9, Lafferty wants supporters of the Grandys to meet at WMAL’s studios (4400 Jenifer St., NW, Washington, DC 20015) with signs “to demonstrate our support for Fred Grandy and his wife and their courageous stand against radical Islam.”

The Secrets Are Out - Mole Inside of CAIR and the Muslim Brotherhood Tells All

This really is a fascinating article from Family Security Matters that details the account of a young man who infiltrated CAIR (Council on American-Islamic Relations) and has divulged the truth behind that Muslim Brotherhood-linked organization. While some of this information is predictable, some of it is simply mind-boggling.

I guess that one of the biggest surprises to me is the sophistication and reach of CAIR - I have often wondered just how this organization has survived through some serious gaffes and some very questionable behavior but you will see in the article that the connections high up for CAIR are strong and many.

From the article, here's a list of key takeaways for the mole inside of CAIR:

Working undercover inside CAIR National taught me several valuable lessons. The most important are:


1. Americans should question the sources within mainstream media. There views are often aligning toward Islamic based terrorist groups. CAIR has spent an enormous amount of money recruiting journalists within the main media organizations….
2. There are many elected officials who support Islamic terrorist organizations and/or who have people on their payroll who do so.
3. CAIR has a better confidential/source network than even our FBI does. Recruiting confidential informants to work on behalf of CAIR (wittingly and unwittingly) is a main priority of CAIR National.
4. CAIR receives hundreds of thousands of dollars from Saudi Arabia.
5. CAIR has a very close relationship with many colleges and universities inside America. The goal is to not necessarily bring non Muslim students into Islam, but rather to use them as future assets in the propaganda war.
6. CAIR and other such organizations conduct ‘Interfaith Meetings’ with Christian and Jewish leaders to use them as allies and tools to help promote the Islamic ideology. CAIR understands many of the Christian leaders are naïve and essentially ignorant when it comes down to their understanding of Islam. CAIR uses the ignorance of Christian leaders to advance their organizational goals.

I want to just touch on that last statement - the fact that Christian leaders in this country are naive to the treachery of CAIR and other islamic organizations in America. We have seen this continually over the years and if you ever have the misfortune of actually reading CAIR's website, you will seen that nearly every week, the jihadis there put up articles about some "kumbaya" meeting they had with Christian (and sometimes Jewish) leaders. Hey, I can understand the forgiving nature of Christian clergy but I won't forgive the stupidity of being used as a tool for evil. It's about time that Christian leaders being duped by the likes of CAIR are singled out and informed of their errors.

The last point I'd like to make is this - with the sudden explosion of notoriety of the Muslim Brotherhood in the past two weeks because of the Egyptian situation, it's a perfect time for American bloggers to keep the light on these locusts in America. The fact that an organization like CAIR has been created in our land, has risen to the power levels that it has and continues to assault the very freedoms and liberties of American is testament of the nature of the Muslim Brotherhood. And it reveals just how dangerous they really are.

My Life Inside CAIR and The Muslim Brotherhood


During the last several weeks Americans have been provided information about the situation in Egypt and more importantly the role of the Muslim Brotherhood. I applaud the awareness many people like Steve Emerson, Tawfik Hamid, my father (Dave Gaubatz) and others have provided to the American people information about the dangers of the Muslim brotherhood. Per the norm the mainstream media (MSM) has lost its course and misled the American people to believe the Muslim Brotherhood situation is ‘over there’. Meaning, once again Americans are being led to believe the problem with the terrorist organization the Muslim Brotherhood is a potential problem only for people in Egypt. Therefore this leads the American public to again have a false sense of security by believing the Muslim Brotherhood poses no threat to Americans in the U.S.

Hopefully this article will open the eyes and minds of the American public who deserve to know the truth. What is the truth?


1. Our intelligence agencies downplay the impact of the Muslim Brotherhood in America. They overwhelmingly say this terrorist organization poses no threat to Americans. The truth is the Muslim Brotherhood is dangerous, have the capability to attack any American city, have continuously stated they will destroy America and Israel, and they have the capability to carry out these acts.
2. Our President knows more about the Muslim Brotherhood than he leads the American people to believe. Mr. Obama also downplays the threat the Muslim Brotherhood poses to America. The truth is Mr. Obama is aware the Muslim Brotherhood has the desire and capability to cause more damage to our country than the attacks of 11 Sep 2001 did.
3. Our senior law enforcement agencies such as the FBI do not inform the American public that the Muslim Brotherhood openly operates throughout America and they have the support of such organizations as CAIR. Note: My father (Dave Gaubatz) and researchers on his team have conducted first-hand research at Muslim Brotherhood facilities in the U.S. One such location is in Philadelphia, PA.

I had previously mentioned CAIR supports the Muslim Brotherhood ideology. Why can I say this? Because I conducted undercover research for several months inside CAIR National and worked daily with the leaders of this organization to include the executive director Nihad Awad and his Public Relations Director Ibrahim Hooper. During my undercover research I had the opportunity to pray with the leaders of CAIR and to speak with them for many hours. I traveled with this organization when they went to various conferences. In public CAIR will say they denounce violence, but behind the scenes they use the same materials to study Islam as the Muslim Brotherhood does. One such Muslim Brotherhood leader that is routinely followed by CAIR and numerous Islamic leaders throughout the U.S. is Sayyid Qutb.

Sayyidd Qutb was an Egyptian and belonged to the Muslim Brotherhood as one of their strongest leaders. Qutb wrote several books pertaining to physical Jihad and other issues. Qutb spent a considerable amount of time at Stanford University and openly spoke about his hatred of America. Qutb was executed by the Egyptian government in 1966. Qutb is just one of many Islamic leaders ‘cherished’ and studied by Muslims in America. My father’s research concluded Qutb’s works are in 80% of the 2300 Islamic centers/mosques in America. Readers can get a better understanding of the Muslim Brotherhood influence in America by reviewing Qutb’s works ‘Milestones’ (downloadable as a pdf) and ‘In The Shade of The Quran’ (15 volumes, downloadable in pdf form from here).

Many people may be wondering why our elected leaders allow the Muslim brotherhood to operate in America and why our government allows such organizations such as CAIR to continue providing material and other support to terrorist organizations. The answer is actually very simple. In our government there are numerous elected officials who support the Muslim Brotherhood. Many of you will now be shaking your heads and saying this cannot be true. It is true. While undercover in CAIR National I had the opportunity to meet, pray with, and review paperwork concerning elected leaders in America who support the Muslim Brotherhood and other terrorist organizations such as Hamas.

If our mainstream media were to actually do their jobs and knew the right questions to ask, it would become apparent to all that there are several key elected leaders in our country who support the Muslim Brotherhood. Congressman Keith Ellison, Congressman Andre Carson, and NC State Senator Larry Shaw are just a sampling of the elected officials who support CAIR, which in turn supports the ideology of Hamas and The Muslim Brotherhood.

My father has often said that CAIR is a ‘terrorist organization’. The information we obtained in over 6 months of undercover work inside CAIR National confirms this. We were able to obtain over 12,000 documents that CAIR National was in the process of shredding/destroying. One such document verifying CAIR’s support for Al Qaeda is in our book ‘Muslim Mafia’. This document alone should be enough for our law enforcement and government to shut this organization down, yet they continue to operate. Again, you and I ask: “Why?” Not only does the Muslim brotherhood have supporters in our elected offices, but they also have supporters inside the U.S. State Department, Law Enforcement (to include the FBI) and within the IRS. During our undercover research we were able to review CAIR’s guest log books going back before 2001. The list of U.S. State Department, FBI Agents, and other law enforcement agencies who visited CAIR National was in the hundreds.

One such individual was Sgt. Weiss Rasool, Fairfax County Police Department, Va. Rasool was an officer who routinely drove his police car to CAIR National and had meetings with CAIR leaders. Rasool would also bring Islamic leaders from Dar Al Hijrah (Falls Church/home of several 9/11 terrorists), the ADAMS Center, and others to visit the Police Academies and arranged meetings with senior law enforcement officials to promote the Islamic ideology. Rasool was also providing suspects and Islamic leaders who were being investigated by law enforcement, detailed information on their cases. He was subsequently prosecuted and his law enforcement credentials were removed.

Working undercover inside CAIR National taught me several valuable lessons. The most important are:


1. Americans should question the sources within mainstream media. There views are often aligning toward Islamic based terrorist groups. CAIR has spent an enormous amount of money recruiting journalists within the main media organizations….
2. There are many elected officials who support Islamic terrorist organizations and/or who have people on their payroll who do so.
3. CAIR has a better confidential/source network than even our FBI does. Recruiting confidential informants to work on behalf of CAIR (wittingly and unwittingly) is a main priority of CAIR National.
4. CAIR receives hundreds of thousands of dollars from Saudi Arabia.
5. CAIR has a very close relationship with many colleges and universities inside America. The goal is to not necessarily bring non Muslim students into Islam, but rather to use them as future assets in the propaganda war.
6. CAIR and other such organizations conduct ‘Interfaith Meetings’ with Christian and Jewish leaders to use them as allies and tools to help promote the Islamic ideology. CAIR understands many of the Christian leaders are naïve and essentially ignorant when it comes down to their understanding of Islam. CAIR uses the ignorance of Christian leaders to advance their organizational goals.

I would like to close this article on a positive note. There are many people who are on CAIR’s ‘Hit List’. These people and organizations are monitored by CAIR on a daily basis. Such people are Daniel Pipes, Steve Emerson, ACT For America, The Center For Security Policy, Dave Gaubatz, Tom Trento, and many others. During my time inside CAIR National I would routinely ‘steer’ the Muslim interns to the sites and articles of these people. Per the norm CAIR National always had photo sessions with all the interns who had worked with CAIR. During my tenure with CAIR and after showing the interns what Emerson and others write about CAIR, all of the Muslim interns refused to have their pictures taken with CAIR National and informed me they did not want future employers to know they had even worked with CAIR. Essentially they were ashamed of CAIR and wanted nothing to do with this pseudo ‘civil rights’ organization. They had worked with CAIR National for several months and saw through the fallacies CAIR was promoting.

I highly encourage Americans to continue being involved and to voice their concerns about the national security issues our country faces due to organizations such as CAIR and the Muslim Brotherhood to openly operate in America.